If this homophobic and transphobic senator has any integrity, he will familiarise himself with the facts and retract his deceitful claims.
.@SenatorAbetz, do you always deceive the senate? Dr Steve Chavura came to my attention not because of his views on marriage but because of his position on the Lachlan Macquarie Institute board. It had *nothing* to do with marriage.
On the morning of Sunday September 24 2017 I approached the shopkeepers in High Street Ashburton, offering them the opportunity to display a “YES” placard in their shop, to indicate their support for marriage equality.
I have previously documented an incident that arose that morning while I was attending Bakers Delight. As a side note, I’m overjoyed to say that to date, almost a week after the Yes vote was announced on Wednesday November 15, Bakers Delight still have their YES placard on prominent display in their shop window.
On the morning of Saturday November 18, as I was driving down High Street, I spotted a massive YES symbol carefully spray painted on the exterior wall of the barber shop. This was in the same design of the placard I supplied to the shopkeepers in the street, presumably inspired by the several placards visible along the street. Adorning the placard was the hashtag #YESASHY, by way of saying “Ashburton says Yes”.
As a resident in the adjoining suburb Ashwood, I am proud to associate myself with the #YESASHY campaign, and thank the artist for their time, money and initiative in furthering the cause of equality.
On March 26 I documented various inaccuracies in this ABC story in my article Straightening out Professor Iain Benson and followed this up with a complaint to the ABC.
On May 18 the ABC responded to my complaint, which in part advised:
ABC Radio advises that although you were not referred to by name, your activism was one of the issues discussed in the program. In response to your complaint, Radio has acknowledged that listeners would likely have drawn the conclusion that your activism concerning Mark Allaby focussed on the issue of same-sex marriage rather than Pride in Diversity. Radio apologises for this oversight. The following clarification has been published on the program page: